![]() ![]() And Gartner’s 2016 Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization listed VMware as the undisputed “leader.” Of course, there’s a difference between server and desktop virtualization, but it’s not a bad accolade to have. In fact, they were the first to virtualize the x86 architecture and make the technology available as a commercial product. It would be an understatement to call VMware the market leader. The latest release, VMware Workstation 12, came out in September of this year. You can use VMware to set up a private cloud, to manage mobile devices in your corporate network, to protect endpoints, and of course, to virtualize stuff.įor the purpose of this comparison, we’ll mostly be looking at VMware Workstation - their desktop virtualization tool for Windows and Linux - and VMware Fusion - their desktop virtualization tool for Mac. VMware isn’t a single product as much an ecosystem of connected tools and applications. ![]() It’s not quite an apples-to-oranges scenario, but it is like comparing apples from two different orchards. ![]() These two solutions, although both reliable, bear some distinct differences that make a lateral comparison complicated. VirtualBox, you’re looking for a tool that will help you create and provision virtual machines (VMs) on desktop devices running an x86-based platform. ĪLSO READ: Top Five Security-as-a-Service Providers ![]() It’s not surprising that roughly 80 percent of x86 server workloads are now virtualized, and the average server runs 16 simultaneous VMs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |